Dr Jeannie Marie Paterson
Publications
2007
The standard of good faith performance: reasonable expectations or community standards?, in Private Law in Theory and Practice, eds Michael Bryan, Routledge-Cavendish, Oxford UK, pp153-166
2004
Principles of Contract Law, (2nd ed, LBC, 2004) with Andrew Robertson
Contract: Cases and Materials (10th ed, LBC, 2004) with Andrew Robertson
2002
‘A Duty to Renegotiate in Good Faith?’, Law of Obligations Conference, February 2002
‘Large Group Teaching’, Commercial Law Teachers Conference, March 2002
2001
‘Good Faith in Commercial Contracts: A Franchising Case Study’, (2001) 29 Australian Business Law Review, pp 270-291
2000
‘Australian Nationhood in the Constitutional Interpretation of Section 117’, (2000) 8 Asia Pacific Law Review 169-190, with Prof HP Lee
‘Should Australian Contract Law have a Duty of Good Faith’ (2000) Law Institute Journal
1998
'Terms Implied in Fact: the Basis for Implication', (1998) 13 Journal of Contract Law 103-125
'Limits on a Lender’s Right to Repayment on Demand: Construction, Implication and Good Faith?', (1998) 26 Australian Business Law Review 258-727
1997
‘Conflicts of Interest and Confidential Information’ (1997) Law Institute Journal 46-9, reprinted in Australian Legal Practice, Journal of the General Practice Section of the Law Council of Australia
‘Implied Terms, Efficiency and the Hypothetical Intentions of the Parties’ Australian Law and Economics Association Conference, July 1997
‘Conflicts of Interest’ and ‘Maintaining Ethical Standards’, Institute of Patent Attorneys Seminar, August 1997
1996
‘The Contract to Negotiate in Good Faith’, (1996) 10 Journal of Contract Law 120-140
‘Metcalfe v NZI Securities’ (misleading and deceptive conduct) (1996) 24 Australian Business Law Review 391-394
‘The Numbers Game’ (1996) Law Institute Journal 14
1995
‘The Roman Law Tradition’ (1995) 21 Monash University Law Review 152-154
1994
'Rylands v Fletcher into Negligence’, (1994) 20 Monash University Law Review 317-329
‘Legal Education and Student Numbers’ (1994) 69 Law Institute Journal 78-79
|